Difference between revisions of "Return of the Schloss paintings demanded by Schloss family attorney (Q8526)"

From jdcrp-wikibase
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(‎Changed an Item: Set sitelink)
(‎Changed an Item)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Property / has subtype
 +
Property / has subtype: history of Schloss collection / rank
 +
Normal rank
Property / has subtype
 +
Property / has subtype: recovery / rank
 +
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 12:51, 29 July 2021

The “Direction des Musées Nationaux” notified Max Gonfreville, the lawyer representing the Schloss heirs, that prints would be made of the Schloss paintings as well as of the paintings belonging to Madame Emile Weil. The Schloss heirs agreed to cover
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Return of the Schloss paintings demanded by Schloss family attorney
The “Direction des Musées Nationaux” notified Max Gonfreville, the lawyer representing the Schloss heirs, that prints would be made of the Schloss paintings as well as of the paintings belonging to Madame Emile Weil. The Schloss heirs agreed to cover

    Statements

    1945-01-22-Gonfreville-demanded-return-Schloss-paintings
    0 references
    timeline
    0 references
    1945-01-22-Gonfreville-demanded-return-Schloss-paintings
    0 references
    Return of the Schloss paintings demanded by Schloss family attorney
    0 references
    22 January 1945
    0 references
    22 January 1945
    0 references
    The “Direction des Musées Nationaux” notified Max Gonfreville, the lawyer representing the Schloss heirs, that prints would be made of the Schloss paintings as well as of the paintings belonging to Madame Emile Weil. The Schloss heirs agreed to cover the costs of paper and printing. The Schloss heirs studied the offer of the Louvre Museum to acquire thirty-two paintings. They turned down the offer
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references