Difference between revisions of "DGER report No 4 (Q8637)"

From jdcrp-wikibase
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(‎Changed an Item)
(‎Changed an Item)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Property / connected to
 +
Property / connected to: Direction Générale des Études & Recherches / rank
 +
Normal rank
Property / connected to
 +
Property / connected to: Louis Darquier de Pellepoix / rank
 +
Normal rank
Property / connected to
 +
Property / connected to: Louis Marie Charles Liénard / rank
 +
Normal rank
Property / connected to
 +
Property / connected to: Jean-François Lefranc / rank
 +
Normal rank
Property / has subtype
 +
Property / has subtype: collection looting / rank
 +
Normal rank
Property / has subtype
 +
Property / has subtype: history of Schloss collection / rank
 +
Normal rank
links / my_wiki / namelinks / my_wiki / name
 +

Latest revision as of 12:53, 29 July 2021

Based on information provided by Darquier de Pellepoix to postwar French authorities and according to the DGER (Bulletin de renseignements No. 4), the Schloss collection was estimated at 2 billion francs before its seizure. It included 329 paintings,
Language Label Description Also known as
English
DGER report No 4
Based on information provided by Darquier de Pellepoix to postwar French authorities and according to the DGER (Bulletin de renseignements No. 4), the Schloss collection was estimated at 2 billion francs before its seizure. It included 329 paintings,

    Statements

    1945-01-16-DGER-report
    0 references
    timeline
    0 references
    1945-01-16-DGER-report
    0 references
    DGER report No 4
    0 references
    16 January 1945
    0 references
    16 January 1945
    0 references
    Based on information provided by Darquier de Pellepoix to postwar French authorities and according to the DGER (Bulletin de renseignements No. 4), the Schloss collection was estimated at 2 billion francs before its seizure. It included 329 paintings, 49 of which went to the Louvre. In the report, Liénard/Liénart and Lefranc were identified as responsible for the collection’s disappearance. The DGE
    0 references
    0 references